Contact Your Senator

Contact Your Representative


End Foreign Oil Dependence: Defeat EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases


End Foreign Oil Dependence: Defeat EPA Regulation of Greenhouse Gases. Sounds like a paradox. But there's a lot more to this than meets the eye. Ending foreign oil dependence is something most Americans believe is a good idea. Accomplishing that goal through Cap-and-Trade or "Cap-and-Tax" legislation, however, was firmly rejected by the American people and Congress listened. Although the bill passed the House on June 26, 2009 it did not get through the Senate. President Obama was not deterred as evidenced by his comments during the 2010 State of the Union Address. The release of the FY 2011 White House Budget further solidified opinion... it has become clear the President will continue his attempt to initiate his "green energy" agenda through the Environmental Protection Agency, (EPA).


Many see this maneuver as a backdoor means of circumventing Congress. Recently, Lisa Jackson, Dir. of the EPA appeared before a hearing of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW) on which Sen. James Inhofe's (R-OK) sits and is the ranking member. Sen. Inhofe questioned Dir. Jackson on the science used by the EPA to evaluate greenhouse gases and stated his strong belief based on additional scientific evidence that global warming is a hoax. Sen. Inhofe also submitted for the public record The US Senate Minority Report: Global Warming (PDF).



Lisa Jackson - EPA & Sen. Inhofe: Global Warming Hoax

**US Senate Minority Report: Global Warming (PDF)**

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


PomeroyMarch 3, 2010 - Rep. Earl Pomeroy (D-ND) submitted "Member's Remarks" before the House Budget Committee in Washington, DC calling for the committee to strike allocations for the regulation of greenhouse gases from the EPA 2011 Budget. Watch all five videos in which Rep. Pomeroy talks about HR 4369, thresholds, BACT, the loss of energy jobs, and the effect of ending fossil fuel subsidies... all ramifications of the FY 2011 White House Budget.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


End Foreign Oil Dependence: But Let's Not Do it the Hard Way!


End Foreign Oil Dependence

Energy is one of the three verticals the Obama administration has identified as a priority along with Education and Healthcare. Although President Obama's campaign rhetoric suggested a more centrist approach to the energy crisis it now appears that he intends to make radical changes in how America obtains and uses energy.


The important question is what will this do to our economy short term? Can we really afford the huge increase in energy costs the "Cap-and-Trade" legislation would inevitably pass on to the consumer? So, in becoming energy independent... do we really have to do it the hard way?


The Obama Administration and the Democrats have an agenda that would include "Cap and Trade" legislation. It requires industries to reduce pollution by capping their carbon emissions to prescribed levels. Many would be required to retro-fit their current facilities in order to meet the new standards. Those who do not choose to retro-fit would be able to purchase the unused carbon emission allotments of those who have. The trading process of these "credits" would create an entirely new private sector marketplace. Whether a company retro-fits or chooses to purchase unused credits, an additional expense to production would be incurred.


That's not all. The Obama Administration and the Democrats are not in favor of developing nuclear energy, drilling off shore or on wildlife reserves such as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), or clean coal technology. They want to go "green" overnight. They plan to do this by legislative "brut force." The repercussions on the auto industry, the gas and oil refining industry, coal mining, etc., will be intense and the American consumer will suffer higher prices for practically everything they purchase. Taking an "ends justifies the means" position on this question doesn't play out if we grind the country's industrial production to a halt for lack of affordable energy!


There is a lot more to this than just "going green." This is a power shift. Changes made in legislation like the ones being proposed will cause a power paradigm shift. The energy vertical as we know it today will be unrecognizable. New "green" corporations will be pushed to the forefront at the expense of the consumer and industry leaders burdened with new requirements. Green companies loyal to the Left for "parting the waters" and enabling their path will replace the once powerful.


Yet our current industry leaders do have solutions... solutions that would provide for an easing into green alternatives while providing affordable energy to consumers. Several weeks ago industry leaders met in Houston at the Cambridge Energy Conference. They presented alternatives in their four day oil, gas and power sessions. I highly recommend that you read through the synopsis.


The take away is this. Most would agree that it is important for the United States to move toward green energy. It reduces pollution and provides a healthier environment in which to live. But it can't be done overnight and we must provide for the transition through well-thought-out plans that include nuclear, clean coal and off-shore drilling (within 50 miles of shoreline). We must prioritize. The first priority is to end foreign oil dependence. The second is to go "green." Energy is a national security issue for this country! Let's become independent first. Then we will have the resources and the time to go "green."


This issue should not be allowed to become another casualty of the Obama Administration's attempt to do everything at once. It's not logical and it's not possible. Diane W. Collins


**This article was originally posted on 3/12/09 at and was written by Diane W. Collins, Founder, Copyright © 2009 All Rights Reserved.


Contact Your Senator

Contact Your Representative





4/6/10: The "No Flower Power" Metaphor

Glad you asked: The electric car cable plugging into the sunflowers above is a metaphor representing the 60s generation radicals "flower power" mantra. We work against these idealistic radicals who have gamed the system to gain power in our government. Unplug the power! Vote in 2010 for Conservatives who believe we do not have to destroy our existing energy paradigm in order to develop clean energy and end foreign oil dependence.


4/4/10 Happy Easter / Passover!

May the Blessings of this Easter / Passover Season be yours.


3/31/10 Offshore Drilling

President Obama is to announce plans for offshore drilling today at 10:00 am CST, Andrews Naval Air Base.







Live C-Span coverage

( Schedule Updates.)


C-Span LIVE C-Span LIVE C-Span LIVE C-Span LIVE  
Watch all channels simultaneously!  


- - - - - - - - - -

White House LIVE White House LIVE



Live White House Briefings

(often start late...)


- - - - - - - - - - -

House Budget Committee

House Budget Committee Hearings LIVE View Hearings LIVE

windows media

CLick Tabs to Open





Rep. Blackburn shows courage as she attempts to fully disclose any financial benefits Al Gore might stand to gain from "Cap and Trade" legislation.


Al Gore's arrogance demonstrated in this video is unbecoming that of a professional at any level... much less one being asked to respectfully respond to the legitimate questions of a United States Representative.



Newt Gingrich has a lot to say about America's energy resources debunking

those who insist "green" energy is America's only way to end foreign oil dependence. We need an "all of the above" approach to solving the energy crisis... one that won't grind industry to a halt and financially burden already strapped consumers. Let's end foreign oil dependence the right way... not the hard way!



According to John Coleman, Founder of The Weather Channel global warming is a fraud. It seems 30,000 other scientists including 9,000 PhDs agree.


Coleman and his group want to sue Al Gore over what they term " false statements" and hope their story will be heard.